Fix concurrency warnings #424
Conversation
|
One thing I notice that's a bit different to #422's attempt is the |
|
@GeorgeElsham I think you used the Swift6 compiler in Swift 5 mode, this definitively not build on my side with Swift 6 |
|
What I did with the Package.swift file allows working with previous compiler versions and in both languages versions. Note that there is [email protected] too. |
|
@Alex293 You're right, I see. I'll try to fix it, thank you. |
|
I think we should gather the opinion of the author and the community if there is interest in using some of the constructs outside of SwiftUI. If not, I don’t think there is much sense in spending effort going further than what I did in the other branch. Did you identify any use cases for non main actor but sendable apis in this repo ? |
|
@davdroman can I ask your opinion ? Do you know about any potential use of this lib APIs outside of of SwiftUI/MainActor ? |
|
@Alex293 not off the top of my head, I'd find it strange that anyone would want to employ introspection in a background thread. |
|
@Alex293 Unfortunately I've had pretty limited time, but I've fixed the issues. It still uses |
|
Hello guys, when are you planning to merge this into the main? From Xcode 16 Beta 3 and Swift 6 mode those warnings are errors. |
|
I can't speak for the maintainers so no merge ETA from me but you can use my fork in the mean time (I'd be glad if you could at least try it to see if there are any thing I missed). Last time I checked, this branch still missed some annotations for things being spi or similar, I can't remember. TBH I'm slightly annoyed to review this branch as I already did the work on another branch and asked which direction to pursue before continuing investing time on any of the branches. I'll wait for the maintainers to chime in and try to contribute any whatever direction they prefer. |
It's seems like your fixes have eliminated errors and warnings. btw stay tuned for maintainer(s)... |
An alternative to #422.
Fixes #418.