[NONEVM-3009] [Testing] Contracts don't lose balance on fees #332
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
patricios-space
force-pushed
the
fix/send-executor-validation
branch
from
92e7f47 to
aaddd51
Compare
patricios-space
force-pushed
the
test/balance-loss-checks
branch
from
46e7246 to
7b3249e
Compare
patricios-space
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NONEVM-3009
CCIP Contracts should not have their balance decreased on tx (except some exceptions) by gas or fwd/action fees. The only expense should be rent fees and all other cost should be covered by the message value.