Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Release-v1.22.0] Changes for prepare release v1.22.0 #2268

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sfc-gh-yzou
Copy link
Collaborator

Prepare for release v1.22.0:

  1. update changelog
  2. update recipe/meta.yaml
  3. update version.py

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@
- Display a clearer error message when `Index.names` is set to a non-like-like object.
- Raise a warning whenever MultiIndex values are pulled in locally.
- Improve warning message for `pd.read_snowflake` include the creation reason when temp table creation is triggered.
- When calling `DataFrame.set_index`, or setting `DataFrame.index` or `Series.index`, with a new index that does not match the current length of the `Series`/`DataFrame` object, a `ValueError` is no longer raised. When the `Series`/`DataFrame` object is longer than the new index, the `Series`/`DataFrame`'s new index is filled with `NaN` values for the "extra" elements. When the `Series`/`DataFrame` object is shorter than the new index, the extra values in the new index are ignored—`Series` and `DataFrame` stay the same length `n`, and use only the first `n` values of the new index.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sfc-gh-azhan @sfc-gh-vbudati i am moving this from behavior change to improvement to avoid extra release process for behavior change.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds good!

Copy link
Contributor

@sfc-gh-helmeleegy sfc-gh-helmeleegy Sep 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make this a bit less verbose? For example the last sentence seems redundant. Also, is this the behavior of native pandas? If so, let's mention that at the beginning. For example:

Suggested change
- When calling `DataFrame.set_index`, or setting `DataFrame.index` or `Series.index`, with a new index that does not match the current length of the `Series`/`DataFrame` object, a `ValueError` is no longer raised. When the `Series`/`DataFrame` object is longer than the new index, the `Series`/`DataFrame`'s new index is filled with `NaN` values for the "extra" elements. When the `Series`/`DataFrame` object is shorter than the new index, the extra values in the new index are ignored`Series` and `DataFrame` stay the same length `n`, and use only the first `n` values of the new index.
- Conform with the behavior of native pandas when calling `DataFrame.set_index`, or setting `DataFrame.index` or `Series.index` with a new index that does not match the current length of the `Series`/`DataFrame` object. A `ValueError` is no longer raised. Instead, when the `Series`/`DataFrame` object is longer than the provided index, the `Series`/`DataFrame`'s new index is filled with `NaN` values for the "extra" elements. When the `Series`/`DataFrame` object is shorter than the provided index, the extra values are ignored in the new index.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure. the first sentence in the suggestion is not correct for the behavior since it actually diverge from the native pandas behavior, it is mainly for performance purpose to avoid eager evaluation. Updated it slightly differently

Copy link

@sfc-gh-pspaeth sfc-gh-pspaeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@sfc-gh-helmeleegy sfc-gh-helmeleegy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (modulo some minor suggestion)

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@
- Display a clearer error message when `Index.names` is set to a non-like-like object.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Display a clearer error -> Display a more clear error

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

Copy link
Contributor

@sfc-gh-mabrennan sfc-gh-mabrennan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made a few small suggestions about the Changelog. Thanks!

@sfc-gh-yzou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

chagnes has cherry picked to main, close this pr

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 11, 2024
Copy link

@sfc-gh-pspaeth sfc-gh-pspaeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants