Skip to content

Conversation

@dakotac-arista
Copy link
Contributor

@dakotac-arista dakotac-arista commented Dec 4, 2025

Why I did it

Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-P32O64 will also be used for a T1 role and they wanted to reuse the QoS settings.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Using a symlink to point to the buffer default values values for the LT2 role.
This will make sure any fixes for LT2 will be carried over.
The same bcm config file with applied QoS settings is already being used.

How to verify it

ls -al shows buffers_defaults_t1.j2 -> buffers_defaults_lt2.j2

Tested on DUT and confirmed the buffer pools/profiles were populated and no issues during sanitize.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • msft-202503
  • msft-202511

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Using a symlink to point to the buffer and pool values for LT2 role QoS.
This will make sure any fixes for LT2 will be carried over.
The same bcm config file with applied QoSO settings is already being used.

Signed-off-by: Dakota Crozier <[email protected]>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants