refactor: enhance override config masic test #16226
Open
+15
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
9 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Enhance the
override_config_table/test_override_config_table_masic.pyto make it compatible with the parallel run infra.Summary:
Fixes # (issue) Microsoft ADO 30056122
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
We wanted to enable parallel run for
override_config_table/test_override_config_table_masic.py, so we need to deprecateenum_upstream_dut_hostname.How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
I ran the updated code and can confirm it's working as expected.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation