Skip to content

Conversation

@hdwhdw
Copy link
Contributor

@hdwhdw hdwhdw commented Dec 5, 2025

This reverts commit 191e522.

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • 202511

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Contributor

@xwjiang-ms xwjiang-ms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@xwjiang-ms
Copy link
Contributor

Seems other gnmi tests got impacted, will try only revert tests/gnmi_e2e/test_gnmi_auth.py

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

This partially reverts the revert commit 16c3a2f, restoring IPv6 support
for most GNMI tests while keeping test_gnmi_auth without IPv6 support to
avoid authentication issues.

Changes:
- Make duthost_mgmt_ip parameter optional in gnmi_capabilities() for backward compatibility
- Restore IPv6 support in test_gnmi.py and test_mimic_hwproxy_cert_rotation.py
- Keep test_gnmi_auth.py without IPv6 support to avoid breaking authentication

Signed-off-by: Dawei Huang <[email protected]>
@hdwhdw hdwhdw force-pushed the revert-test-gnmi-auth-fix branch from 942a548 to 425673c Compare December 5, 2025 17:26
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants