Skip to content

fix(speckleifc): Handle edgecase where face count is zero #441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

JR-Morgan
Copy link
Member

Haven't been able to reproduce this case with the current opencascade engine, but while testing the CGAL engine, it was possible for it to output geometry with zero faces, which our code doesn't properly handle.

@JR-Morgan JR-Morgan requested a review from gjedlicska July 28, 2025 09:37
@JR-Morgan JR-Morgan enabled auto-merge (squash) July 28, 2025 09:37
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.08%. Comparing base (55bc1b2) to head (10e84fb).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #441   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.08%   90.08%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines        6140     6140           
=======================================
  Hits         5531     5531           
  Misses        609      609           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@JR-Morgan JR-Morgan merged commit f584ad8 into main Jul 28, 2025
7 checks passed
@JR-Morgan JR-Morgan deleted the jrm/ifc-face-count branch July 28, 2025 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants