Skip to content

Book housekeeping #138

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025
Merged

Book housekeeping #138

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025

Conversation

BowTiedRadone
Copy link
Collaborator

@BowTiedRadone BowTiedRadone commented Apr 15, 2025

This PR addresses a misleading detail found in the book, flagged by @hugocaillard. Related to #127.

This commit addresses a misleading detail found in the book, flagged by @hugocaillard.
@BowTiedRadone BowTiedRadone requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2025 17:04
@BowTiedRadone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@moodmosaic Before merging we should check if the docs publishing action still works. If not, we should tackle it in this PR, too.

Copy link
Member

@moodmosaic moodmosaic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 📖 📕

@BowTiedRadone BowTiedRadone merged commit 28b0448 into master Apr 15, 2025
22 checks passed
@BowTiedRadone BowTiedRadone deleted the housekeeping/book branch April 15, 2025 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants