Skip to content

fix: add package read permission for container jobs #2527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: int
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shubham-stepsecurity
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@step-security-bot step-security-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find StepSecurity AI-CodeWise code comments below.

Code Comments

remediation/workflow/permissions/permissions.go

[
    {
        "Severity": "High",
        "Recommendation": "Ensure sensitive data like container image information is handled securely.",
        "Description": "The code directly checks if the job is a container job by looking at the presence of the container image. This can expose sensitive information and potentially lead to security risks.",
        "Remediation": "Instead of directly checking if job.Container.Image is not empty to determine if it is a container job, introduce a more secure way to handle this sensitive information, such as using environment variables or configuration settings."
    },
    {
        "Severity": "Medium",
        "Recommendation": "Avoid hardcoding sensitive data or logic directly in the code.",
        "Description": "The code explicitly adds a permission for a container job along with a comment, potentially exposing the logic around handling container jobs.",
        "Remediation": "Move the logic related to handling a container job to a configuration file or environment variable to avoid hardcoding it in the codebase."
    }
]

remediation/workflow/secureworkflow_test.go

[
    {
        "Severity": "High",
        "Recommendation": "Avoid hardcoding sensitive information in code",
        "Description": "The code contains a sensitive information 'addPermissions' hardcoded directly in the source code, which can be a security risk. It's always recommended to avoid hardcoding sensitive information in code.",
        "Remediation": "Store sensitive information such as 'addPermissions' in a secure configuration file or environment variables."
    },
    {
        "Severity": "Medium",
        "Recommendation": "Implement input validation for query parameters",
        "Description": "The code uses 'queryParams["addPermissions"] = "true"' without any input validation. It's important to validate input values to prevent injection attacks or unexpected behavior.",
        "Remediation": "Implement input validation for 'addPermissions' query parameter to ensure it meets the expected format or values before usage."
    }
]

testfiles/secureworkflow/output/container-job.yml

[
    {
        "Severity": "High",
        "Recommendation": "Avoid Storing Sensitive Information in Code",
        "Description": "Storing sensitive information in code, such as permissions, can lead to security vulnerabilities.",
        "Remediation": {
            "Change": "Store sensitive information securely outside of the codebase, such as in environment variables or a secure storage service.",
            "Example": "Instead of directly mentioning permissions in the code, use environment variables to fetch these permissions securely."
        }
    },
    {
        "Severity": "Medium",
        "Recommendation": "Specify Exact Permissions Needed",
        "Description": "Specifying broad permissions like 'read' for all contents or packages can increase the attack surface and potential risks.",
        "Remediation": {
            "Change": "Specify the exact minimal permissions required for the job to function instead of broad permissions like 'read'.",
            "Example": "Define more specific permissions based on the actual requirements, such as read access only to specific directories or files."
        }
    },
    {
        "Severity": "Low",
        "Recommendation": "Use Explicit Comments for Justification",
        "Description": "It's beneficial to include explicit comments explaining the reason behind permissions to enhance maintainability and understanding.",
        "Remediation": {
            "Change": "Add comments explaining the justification for each permission within the codebase.",
            "Example": "Include comments like '# Fetching code for actions/checkout' or '# Required for container job' to clarify the purpose of each permission."
        }
    }
]

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us improve the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on this comment. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. If you have questions or detailed feedback, please create n GitHub issue in StepSecurity/AI-CodeWise.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants