Skip to content

chore: use rector/rector #21

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2025
Merged

chore: use rector/rector #21

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2025

Conversation

OskarStark
Copy link
Collaborator

@OskarStark OskarStark commented Mar 28, 2025

Todos

  • add GHA workflow

@OskarStark OskarStark self-assigned this Mar 28, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.19%. Comparing base (7fc5574) to head (985fffb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #21   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     92.19%   92.19%           
  Complexity       75       75           
=========================================
  Files            14       14           
  Lines           333      333           
=========================================
  Hits            307      307           
  Misses           26       26           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@OskarStark OskarStark requested a review from silasjoisten March 28, 2025 12:23
@OskarStark OskarStark changed the title chore: use rector/rector chore: use rector/rector Mar 28, 2025
@silasjoisten silasjoisten merged commit 11d0ef6 into master Mar 28, 2025
4 checks passed
@silasjoisten silasjoisten deleted the feature/rector branch March 28, 2025 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants