[Draft] Enable psycopg v3 tests

[kwongtn]

Description

Merge the following first:

• Update test scope to include django 5.1, update pre-commit hooks #683
• test: Replace django mptt with django tree queries for tests #684

P.s. Not sure if putting like 50 test scenarios is a good idea though 😅

Also I was thinking -- are we even using postgres in tests? 🤔

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Checklist

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

Summary by Sourcery

Tests:

• Add tests for psycopg v3 compatibility.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR enables tests for psycopg v3, expands Django and Python version support, and migrates from django-mptt to django-tree-queries.

Class diagram showing tree structure migration

classDiagram
    note for TreeNode "Replaces MPTT implementation"
    class TreeNode {
        +parent: TreeNode
        +children: List[TreeNode]
        +depth: int
        +path: str
    }
    TreeNode --> TreeNode: parent
    note for ArrayField "Now supports both psycopg2 and psycopg3"
    class ArrayField {
        +base_field
        +size: Optional[int]
        +default: Any
    }

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Enable psycopg v3 tests	Added "psycopg" to the test matrix, enabling tests with psycopg v3. Added installation steps for both psycopg and psycopg-binary packages within the test workflow.	.github/workflows/tests.yml
Expand Django and Python version support	Added Django 5.1 to the test matrix. Included Python 3.8 and Django 4.2 combination in the test matrix. Adjusted exclusions to reflect the supported Python versions for each Django version (e.g., Django 4.2 with Python 3.13, Django 5.0 with Python 3.9 and 3.13, Django 5.1 with Python 3.9).	.github/workflows/tests.yml
Migrate from django-mptt to django-tree-queries	Replaced django-mptt with django-tree-queries in pyproject.toml. Updated imports and model definitions to use django-tree-queries instead of django-mptt. Renamed MPTT-related classes and files to TreeNode. Updated tests to reflect the changes in models and imports. Created new TreeNode-related files and tests. Removed MPTT-related files and tests.	pyproject.toml tests/relay/mptt/test_nested_children.py tests/relay/treenode/test_nested_children.py tests/relay/mptt/models.py tests/relay/treenode/models.py tests/relay/mptt/test_lazy_annotations.py tests/relay/treenode/test_lazy_annotations.py tests/relay/treenode/b.py tests/relay/treenode/a.py tests/relay/mptt/a.py tests/relay/mptt/b.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.17%. Comparing base (48b54fd) to head (d13d70c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #685   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.17%   89.17%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        3778     3778           
=======================================
  Hits         3369     3369           
  Misses        409      409           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bellini666]

@kwongtn now you can rebase this 😊

[bellini666]

@kwongtn are you still going to work on this?