Skip to content

feat(shield): allow support for alt regions #2232

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 8, 2025

Conversation

AlbertoBarba
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Checklist

  • Title of the PR starts with type and scope, (e.g. feat(agent,node-analyzer,sysdig-deploy):)
  • Chart Version bumped for the respective charts
  • Variables are documented in the README.md (or README.tpl in some charts)
  • Check GithubAction checks (like lint) to avoid merge-check stoppers
  • All test files are added in the tests folder of their respective chart and have a "_test" suffix

@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba self-assigned this Apr 24, 2025
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba force-pushed the feat/shield/alt-regions branch 2 times, most recently from fc39b52 to b0ca66b Compare May 1, 2025 14:00
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba force-pushed the feat/shield/alt-regions branch 2 times, most recently from ecafbdf to 99a99de Compare May 7, 2025 10:37
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2025 18:24
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba requested a review from a team as a code owner May 7, 2025 18:24
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba force-pushed the feat/shield/alt-regions branch from 99a99de to afba646 Compare May 8, 2025 10:01
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba enabled auto-merge (squash) May 8, 2025 10:01
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba merged commit bf68f6f into main May 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba deleted the feat/shield/alt-regions branch May 8, 2025 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants