Skip to content

Editorial: Explain the nature of TypedArray property handling #3571

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

gibson042
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #3565

Copy link
Contributor

@bakkot bakkot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm other than my comment

Copy link
Contributor

@syg syg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm % question

@michaelficarra michaelficarra requested a review from syg April 30, 2025 22:51
@michaelficarra michaelficarra added the ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land. label May 1, 2025
@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the gh-3565-typedarray-property-handling-explanation branch from 514a0db to 1a5472c Compare May 3, 2025 06:08
@ljharb ljharb merged commit 1a5472c into tc39:main May 3, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can TypedArray properties be partitioned better?
5 participants