-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Ce projects da #92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ce projects da #92
Conversation
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
/run pipeline |
/run pipeline |
/run pipeline |
/run pipeline |
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
/run pipeline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see comments
"ibmcloud_api_key": $VALIDATION_APIKEY, | ||
"resource_group_name": $PREFIX, | ||
"prefix": $PREFIX, | ||
"project_names": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah this syntax is not supported. The variable substitution only works for strings right now. However you should be able to do this and it will add the prefix value to each project name right? So the validation wont have ant name clashes.
"project_names": "[\"project1\", \"project2\"]"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A list of project names is required input. Is there another way of passing the values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That string will convert to a terraform list when passed to projects / schematics. Just like it does here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daniel-butler-irl you still need to update to "project_names": "[\"project1\", \"project2\"]"
for this to work
ibm_catalog.json
Outdated
@@ -119,6 +119,45 @@ | |||
} | |||
] | |||
} | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"label": "New Code Engine Projects", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Projects -> projects (I think @SirSpidey would request that :))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🥇 for Conall.
LC projects, as you have at L143
/run pipeline |
solutions/projects/README.md
Outdated
This deployable architecture creates IBM Cloud Code Engine projects and the following optional resources: | ||
|
||
- A resource group. | ||
- A Code Engine projects. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you already mention on line 3 that is creates code engine projects
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need to update .catalog-onboard-pipeline.yaml
and add the new variation to it for catalog pipeline to import it
/run pipeline |
install_type: fullstack | ||
scc: | ||
instance_id: 1c7d5f78-9262-44c3-b779-b28fe4d88c37 | ||
region: us-south |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you didnt include any compliance section in the ibm_catalog.json so these SCC details will not be used. This means that no SCC scan will be done, and the flavor wont show a compliance tab in the tile. If there is even 1 compliance rule that is applicable to code engine projects, we should probably add a compliance section to the ibm_catalog.json for this flavor, but I’ll create a follow up issue so we don't hold this PR up
@daniel-butler-irl still one items to address: https://github.com/terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-code-engine/pull/92/files#r1731537672 Also please note this comment |
/run pipeline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving so the new variation can be published. Created 1 follow up issue: #95
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.2.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Description
Release required?
x.x.X
)x.X.x
)X.x.x
)Release notes content
Run the pipeline
If the CI pipeline doesn't run when you create the PR, the PR requires a user with GitHub collaborators access to run the pipeline.
Run the CI pipeline when the PR is ready for review and you expect tests to pass. Add a comment to the PR with the following text:
Checklist for reviewers
For mergers