Skip to content

Only list required v3_req parameters in openssl.conf #3700

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member

What changes are you introducing?

Removing selected [v3_req] parameters from example openssl.cnf.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

The current list includes parameters that are not strictly necessary. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-31112

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

N/A

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Feb 26, 2025
@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova removed the Needs testing Requires functional testing label Feb 26, 2025
@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

I recall @lpramuk saying that he might be willing to test this :) Can you, Lukáš? Please, let me know what you find out.

@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2025 14:36
keyUsage = digitalSignature, nonRepudiation, keyEncipherment, dataEncipherment
extendedKeyUsage = serverAuth, clientAuth, codeSigning, emailProtection
keyUsage = digitalSignature, keyEncipherment
extendedKeyUsage = serverAuth, clientAuth
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The testing of this uses this configuration which includes some of these (as it was following the docs): https://github.com/SatelliteQE/robottelo/blob/7306155b578f1f574f7ad07060b09fdfaa8d9e3f/tests/foreman/data/openssl.cnf#L60-L61

We should update that to match this.

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

@lpramuk might be able to test next week.

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

@lpramuk and/or @ehelms, does SatelliteQE/robottelo#17987 mean that we can merge this doc PR as well?

@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Apr 11, 2025
@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

Dear writers, anyone up for a style review?

Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; link works

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Apr 11, 2025
@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova merged commit c5ad188 into theforeman:master Apr 11, 2025
9 checks passed
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
aneta-petrova added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

Merged to "master" and cherry-picked:

23f1d0b..5535745 3.14 -> 3.14
7c77419..42a973e 3.13 -> 3.13
98aa730..e5d099d 3.12 -> 3.12
74e17b2..4dd7a9d 3.11 -> 3.11
1eb3a2a..9d8ae60 3.10 -> 3.10
854aa95..a769def 3.9 -> 3.9
3115f6b..96489a3 3.8 -> 3.8
c715e40..709f15d 3.7 -> 3.7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants