Skip to content

Drop all oVirt/RHV #3800

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka commented Apr 23, 2025

What changes are you introducing?

Dropping oVirt compute resource provider, all oVirt mentions and attributes

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

oVirt integration is going to be deprecated in 3.15 and removed in 3.16

https://community.theforeman.org/t/rfc-deprecation-and-removal-of-ovirt-compute-resource/42527
https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/38266
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-12005

Related to #3724

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

  • Please, double check that I'm not removing anything that should stay
  • Merge has to wait after 6.15 branching
  • Target release: 3.16

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into: N/A

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Apr 23, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka added the Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged label Apr 23, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 23, 2025

The PR preview for 1f294cc is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-3800.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

two small comments, rest LGTM style-wise. I will ask my colleagues on the state of oVirt support in upstream/downstream and report back to you.

@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor

For upstream and downstream orcharhino, this is OK if we merge it to "master" after branching 3.15.

Co-authored-by: Maximilian Kolb <[email protected]>
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stejskalleos Tech ack, please.

Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Lena, style-wise LGTM.

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Apr 28, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka changed the title Drop all oVirt Drop all oVirt/RHV Apr 28, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka removed the Needs testing Requires functional testing label Apr 28, 2025
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since this is a removal, I don't think it will need testing. Tech ack should suffice.

Copy link
Contributor

@stejskalleos stejskalleos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some files that should be updated / removed as well:

  • guides/common/modules/ref_troubleshooting-virt-who.adoc
  • guides/common/modules/snip_steps-create-a-host-tab-interfaces.adoc
  • guides/common/modules/proc_searching-for-hosts-with-a-specific-fact-value.adoc
  • guides/common/modules/proc_adding-images-to-server.adoc

@pr-processor pr-processor bot added the Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author label Apr 29, 2025
@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Needs re-review and removed Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author labels Apr 29, 2025
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stejskalleos @maximiliankolb Can you, please, re-review the latest commit?

Copy link
Contributor

@stejskalleos stejskalleos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍏 LGTM

The linkchecker is failing on the https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub/grub.html#Shell_002dlike-scripting URL, but I tried it and it's working.

Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style-wise LGTM

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Apr 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants