Skip to content

Conversation

@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka commented Dec 17, 2025

What changes are you introducing?

DITA-fying the Managing application lifecycles chapter of the Managing content guide

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

DITA compliance

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

  • Abstracts will be reviewed later.

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Dec 17, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Dec 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 17, 2025

The PR preview for 4039dd9 is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4551.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

@Lennonka Lennonka marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2025 23:38
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some minor suggestions, overall LGTM

Co-authored-by: Maximilian Kolb <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Lena, LGTM

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Dec 19, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka merged commit 72bd47c into theforeman:master Dec 19, 2025
10 checks passed
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2025
Lennonka added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2025
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cherry picked:

@Lennonka Lennonka deleted the comply-dita-mng-content-lifecycles branch December 19, 2025 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants