Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Keep metadata in justifications and stack info results #2180

Open
8 tasks
Tracked by #417
fridex opened this issue Nov 22, 2021 · 8 comments
Open
8 tasks
Tracked by #417

[EPIC] Keep metadata in justifications and stack info results #2180

fridex opened this issue Nov 22, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/stack-guidance Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Stack Guidance. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@fridex
Copy link
Contributor

fridex commented Nov 22, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

As a user of Thoth, I would like to have machine-readable access to the results of the recommendation engine. To support this, I would like to access results and read metadata in each justification and stack info entry. An example can be a justification entry provided by the unit responsible for providing CVE information - it can state how fresh the data are. Then, each user of Thoth would have access to this information and would be able to read this information.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add additional metadata to justification and stack info results of the recommendation engine results.

Acceptance criteria

  • make sure there is defined a set of tags/categories stating how additional metadata should look like
  • make sure prescriptions-refresh-job creates prescriptions with additional tags/categories in metadata
  • make sure adviser provides tags/categories in metadata
  • make sure Thoth Search UI consumes additional metadata in justifications as provided by the backend
  • experiment with possible integration in thamos
@fridex fridex added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Nov 22, 2021
@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Jan 14, 2022

/priority important-soon
/triage accepted

@sesheta sesheta added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. labels Jan 14, 2022
@codificat
Copy link
Member

/sig stack-guidance

@sesheta sesheta added the sig/stack-guidance Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Stack Guidance. label Apr 4, 2022
@fridex fridex changed the title Keep metadata in justifications and stack info results [EPIC} Keep metadata in justifications and stack info results Apr 4, 2022
@fridex fridex changed the title [EPIC} Keep metadata in justifications and stack info results [EPIC] Keep metadata in justifications and stack info results Apr 4, 2022
@mayaCostantini
Copy link
Contributor

/lifecycle active

@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. label Apr 21, 2022
@codificat
Copy link
Member

/assign @mayaCostantini

@Gkrumbach07
Copy link
Member

Was looking at openssf Big Query database and noticed that scorecard-v2 gives extra details like specific scores for each check. Can the scorecard justification include this data?

scorecard-v2 schema
image

More data the better, but priority would be reason (already included), score, name, details, short

@mayaCostantini
Copy link
Contributor

Are these scores also present for the most recent version of the Scorecards database (v3) that we would like to use? I am not sure if the new schema includes them, but it is worth checking as this would provide useful information.

@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Aug 7, 2022

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@sesheta sesheta added lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. and removed lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. labels Aug 7, 2022
@mayaCostantini
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle active

@sesheta sesheta removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 7, 2022
@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. label Aug 7, 2022
@codificat codificat moved this to 🏗 In progress in Planning Board Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/stack-guidance Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Stack Guidance. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants