Skip to content

chore: update readme to use .by instead of group_by()#7803

Open
wurli wants to merge 1 commit intotidyverse:mainfrom
wurli:chore/update-readme
Open

chore: update readme to use .by instead of group_by()#7803
wurli wants to merge 1 commit intotidyverse:mainfrom
wurli:chore/update-readme

Conversation

@wurli
Copy link

@wurli wurli commented Feb 4, 2026

Please feel free to reject this if you prefer to keep as-is. Just thought the upcoming release might be a nice time to make this change since .by is no longer experimental :)

Thanks for the great work on the latest release!

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Member

This is slightly inconsistent with the opening paragraph

These all combine naturally with `group_by()` which allows you to
perform any operation “by group”. You can learn more about them in
`vignette("dplyr")`. As well as these single-table verbs, dplyr also
provides a variety of two-table verbs, which you can learn about in
`vignette("two-table")`.

Since then we use a different grouping style in the examples. But i think it just requires a little tweaking. I'll take a look, I would not be opposed to this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants