Draft lifecycle 0.1.0 post #326
Conversation
lionel-
force-pushed
the
add-lifecycle-0-1-0
branch
from
c56c19d to
84f33dc
Compare
lionel-
force-pushed
the
add-lifecycle-0-1-0
branch
from
6af90c9 to
7af559a
Compare
jennybc
left a comment
jennybc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm eager to start using this, so I read & reviewed. I asked a few questions that came to mind.
Maybe point at one or more packages that are already using this, in case people want to see usage in the wild?
batpigandme
left a comment
batpigandme
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Very excited about this package. Just a few suggestions.
|
Thanks for the reviews @jennybc and @batpigandme, I think all is now addressed. |
Co-Authored-By: Hadley Wickham <[email protected]>
|
@batpigandme @hadley I have now documented the forgotten "retired" stage. I have included both retired and deprecated stages in a broader "Termination stages" category, in contrast to the "Development stages". Does this make sense? |
|
Does this need to be changed again to reflect "retired" → "superseded"? |
|
Fixes #114. Is it worth finishing this off and getting it published next week? |
|
Should we close this since we did https://www.tidyverse.org/blog/2021/02/lifecycle-1-0-0/ ? |
|
yup I had completely forgot about this one. |
No description provided.