simplify impl of read table properties#668
Open
Connor1996 wants to merge 1 commit intotikv:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Connor1996 <zbk602423539@gmail.com>
BusyJay
reviewed
Nov 16, 2021
| const crocksdb_sstfilereader_t* reader) { | ||
| auto props = reader->rep->GetTableProperties(); | ||
| cb(ctx, reinterpret_cast<const crocksdb_table_properties_t*>(props.get())); | ||
| return reinterpret_cast<const crocksdb_table_properties_t*>(props.get()); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the pointer still valid when props is dropped?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, it's a shared ptr from TableReader. In the context of read_table_properties, TableReader is promised not to be dropped.
BusyJay
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2021
Member
Author
|
/test |
Member
Author
|
/build |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rudracomplains about the potential double-free issue https://paper.seebug.org/1728/#05-panic-safety-double-free-rustsec-2021-0011, so simplify it to avoid usingmem::forgot