Skip to content

Add setting fetch_new_remotes: true #1985

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025
Merged

Add setting fetch_new_remotes: true #1985

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

kaste
Copy link
Member

@kaste kaste commented Apr 24, 2025

When adding remotes, we always asked if we should now also fetch this remote. Add "fetch_new_remotes" and just fetch without asking if set to True.

This is also the default because frankly you likely want that. (Except for huge repos, but then set this in the project settings, no?)

When adding remotes, we always asked if we should now also fetch this
remote.  Add "fetch_new_remotes" and just fetch without asking if set
to `True`.

This is also the default because frankly you likely want that.  (Except
for huge repos, but then set this in the project settings, no?)
@kaste kaste enabled auto-merge April 24, 2025 15:59
@kaste kaste merged commit 22f4762 into master Apr 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@kaste kaste deleted the remote-fetch branch April 24, 2025 16:00
@kaste
Copy link
Member Author

kaste commented Apr 24, 2025

Ideally, we had an UI where we could select which refs we're interested in. E.g. a preview of what the remote provides -- esp. highlighting the stuff we don't have already. Also very likely we don't need the tags, as tags tend to be shared ("centralized") even in a distributed git system.

@kaste
Copy link
Member Author

kaste commented Apr 28, 2025

Ref #390 which introduced the fetch-after-dialog feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant