Allow primary key to be specified for relationship #333
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- When `through_tables` are explicitly specified, the table gets added to the tree when it shouldn't.
Workaround for Prisma-managed implicit through tables that have no primary key defined - prisma/prisma#11110
|
Thanks for opening this PR and sorry for the delay. |
|
My use case here is to work around a situation where my through table does not have an official primary key (and currently cannot have a primary key), but it does have a composite unique key. I want to be able to specify the primary key for the relationship the same way I can for nodes and children. Thank you for making |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Needed for through tables that have no primary key defined