Onnx op topk #2305
Onnx op topk #2305
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2305 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.79% 85.43% -0.36%
==========================================
Files 754 766 +12
Lines 95189 98065 +2876
==========================================
+ Hits 81671 83786 +2115
- Misses 13518 14279 +761 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Anytime had fun working on it. Also I finished making the changes. |
| let largest = match node.attrs.get("largest") { | ||
| Some(val) => val.clone().into_i64(), | ||
| _ => 1, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you're not checking for "k" as the second input of the node (for opsets 10, 11) and just adding support for opset 1, then we don't need to check for the "largest" attribute here. It's only present in the later version 11 of the op.
So we can remove this from the config and node.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sure thing will remove and resubmit tonight
| @@ -726,20 +726,53 @@ where | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| /// Returns the `k` largest elements of the given input tensor along a given dimension. | |||
| pub fn topk(self, k: usize, dim: usize) -> Tensor<B, D, K> { | |||
| pub fn topk(self, k: usize, dim: usize, largest: Option<usize>) -> Tensor<B, D, K> { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since we're only adding support for opset 1, the "largest" option is not necessary. We can remove the changes to the tensor API.
In any case, it would have been preferable to add it as another method, similar to sort & sort_descending. Something like topk and topk_smallest. But not required for this PR 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sounds good will remove the tensor api changes as well
| @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ fn main() { | |||
| .input("tests/sum/sum_int.onnx") | |||
| .input("tests/tanh/tanh.onnx") | |||
| .input("tests/tile/tile.onnx") | |||
| .input("tests/top_k/top_k.onnx") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks the CI caught something I missed! This file doesn't exist anymore with your changes :)
|
This PR has been marked as stale because it has not been updated for over a month |
Pull Request Template
Checklist
run-checks allscript has been executed.test_rotary_encoding_forwardfailed but passed when I ran it via the uiRelated Issues/PRs
#1714
Provide links to relevant issues and dependent PRs.
#1714
Changes
fn tanh_should_not_have_numerical_bugs_on_macos()only run on macosIOEntry::Nodein theinput_names_map. This was important as before it was never incremented with the number of outputs so you would always have _1 as the output name suffix even if there were x >= 2 outputs.Summarize the problem being addressed and your solution.
Testing
ran the below:
cargo test./run-checks.sh allDescribe how these changes have been tested.
instructions listed here and here