Skip to content

Use TrixiTest.jl #100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 13, 2025
Merged

Use TrixiTest.jl #100

merged 3 commits into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

JoshuaLampert
Copy link
Member

This is the analogous PR to Trixi.jls trixi-framework/Trixi.jl#2395, which simplifies the custom @test_nowarn a bit to reduce maintenance. The main part has been outsourced to TrixiTest.jl.

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.19%. Comparing base (a2d5afc) to head (c0d6d98).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #100   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.19%   99.19%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        3449     3449           
=======================================
  Hits         3421     3421           
  Misses         28       28           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@patrickersing
Copy link
Member

The pending tests are to be expected since they were introduced as part of #96, but are not yet in main.

@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented May 12, 2025

Shall this PR be merged?

@patrickersing
Copy link
Member

Shall this PR be merged?

From my end this looks ready to merge. However, someone else needs to merge this as I don't have the necessary permissions (due to pending tests).

Thanks @JoshuaLampert for streamlining our testing infrastructure! 👍

@ranocha ranocha merged commit 75de71d into main May 13, 2025
22 checks passed
@ranocha ranocha deleted the trixitest branch May 13, 2025 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants