-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Add test for unsolved high density node #154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
"width": 4.1875, | ||
"height": 4.1875, | ||
"layer": "top", | ||
"availableZ": [0, 1], | ||
"_depth": 3, | ||
"_parent": { | ||
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn6", | ||
"center": { | ||
"x": 12.5625, | ||
"y": 2.9525000000000006 | ||
}, | ||
"width": 8.375, | ||
"height": 8.375, | ||
"layer": "top", | ||
"availableZ": [0, 1], | ||
"_depth": 2, | ||
"_parent": { | ||
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn4", | ||
"center": { | ||
"x": 8.375, | ||
"y": 7.140000000000001 | ||
}, | ||
"width": 16.75, | ||
"height": 16.75, | ||
"layer": "top", | ||
"availableZ": [0, 1], | ||
"_depth": 1, | ||
"_parent": { | ||
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn0", | ||
"center": { | ||
"x": 0, | ||
"y": -1.2349999999999994 | ||
}, | ||
"width": 33.5, | ||
"height": 33.5, | ||
"layer": "top", | ||
"availableZ": [0, 1], | ||
"_depth": 0, | ||
"_containsTarget": true, | ||
"_containsObstacle": true, | ||
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false | ||
}, | ||
"_containsObstacle": true, | ||
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_14", | ||
"_containsTarget": true, | ||
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false | ||
}, | ||
"_containsObstacle": true, | ||
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_14", | ||
"_containsTarget": true, | ||
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false | ||
}, | ||
"_containsObstacle": true, | ||
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_10", | ||
"_containsTarget": true, | ||
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false | ||
}, | ||
"_containsObstacle": true, | ||
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_11", | ||
"_containsTarget": true, | ||
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false | ||
}, | ||
"_containsObstacle": false | ||
}, | ||
"nodeWithPortPoints": { | ||
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn670", | ||
"portPoints": [ | ||
{ | ||
"x": 12.0390625, | ||
"y": 5.046250000000001, | ||
"z": 0, | ||
"connectionName": "source_trace_12" | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"x": 12.0390625, | ||
"y": 6.093125000000001, | ||
"z": 0, | ||
"connectionName": "source_trace_12" | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"x": 11.515625, | ||
"y": 5.110083841463414, | ||
"z": 1, | ||
"connectionName": "source_trace_11" | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"x": 11.515625, | ||
"y": 5.569687500000001, | ||
"z": 0, | ||
"connectionName": "source_trace_11" | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"center": { | ||
"x": 12.0390625, | ||
"y": 5.569687500000001 | ||
}, | ||
"width": 1.046875, | ||
"height": 1.046875 | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider renaming the file from cn670-nodeWithPortPoints.json
to cn670-node-with-port-points.json
to maintain consistency with kebab-case naming conventions that appear to be used in the project. This makes file naming more predictable across the codebase.
Spotted by Diamond (based on custom rules)
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.
Summary
Testing
bun test tests/bugs/cn670-not-routing.test.ts
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_b_6852d9553860832ea7532b04131b032a