Skip to content

Tidy the usage docs, including ancestral state specs #1025

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

hyanwong
Copy link
Member

Also fixes #1024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.41%. Comparing base (44827ed) to head (18b8467).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1025   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.41%   93.41%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        6496     6496           
  Branches     1107     1107           
=======================================
  Hits         6068     6068           
  Misses        291      291           
  Partials      137      137           
Flag Coverage Δ
C 93.41% <ø> (ø)
python 95.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@benjeffery benjeffery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks! I found one teeny tiny nit.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 20788d3 into tskit-dev:main Apr 1, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should the documented example use 1-based .vcz positions
3 participants