Skip to content

Improve paths handling #1064

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Improve paths handling #1064

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

hmgaudecker
Copy link
Collaborator

@hmgaudecker hmgaudecker commented Jul 28, 2025

  • Use and expose gettsim.germany.ROOT_PATH, add a test (seems like there was a bug before)
  • Mirror relevant changes from TTSIM PR #22
  • Correct version in docs

@hmgaudecker hmgaudecker requested a review from MImmesberger July 28, 2025 08:45
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link
Collaborator

@MImmesberger MImmesberger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a .is_dir() test as I did in #1065? It seems like no test fails if root path is wrong (now they do because the test dir is relative to root, but still...)

@hmgaudecker hmgaudecker changed the title Small architecture improvements Improve paths handling Jul 28, 2025
@hmgaudecker hmgaudecker merged commit be95562 into main Jul 28, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@hmgaudecker hmgaudecker deleted the small-architecture-improvements branch July 28, 2025 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants