Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update scalacheck to 1.14.3 #764

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2019
Merged

Update scalacheck to 1.14.3 #764

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2019

Conversation

nevillelyh
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@regadas
Copy link
Collaborator

regadas commented Dec 17, 2019

Isn't this a dup of #761 ? 😄

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #764 into develop will increase coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #764      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    89.29%   89.46%   +0.17%     
===========================================
  Files          115      115              
  Lines         9011     9011              
  Branches       335      335              
===========================================
+ Hits          8046     8062      +16     
+ Misses         965      949      -16
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../main/scala/com/twitter/algebird/Successible.scala 91.66% <0%> (+4.16%) ⬆️
...main/scala/com/twitter/algebird/monad/Reader.scala 55.55% <0%> (+5.55%) ⬆️
...src/main/scala/com/twitter/algebird/Interval.scala 88.69% <0%> (+12.17%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf4f94b...fc22e9b. Read the comment docs.

@nevillelyh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@regadas it's a rebase after fixing ruby gem issue.

@nevillelyh nevillelyh merged commit 2421a6b into develop Dec 17, 2019
@nevillelyh nevillelyh deleted the neville/scalacheck branch December 17, 2019 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants