Skip to content

Conversation

BrianCurtis-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Commit Queue Requirements:

  • Fill out all sections of this template.
  • All sub component pull requests have been reviewed by their code managers.
  • Run the full Intel+GNU RT suite (compared to current baselines) on either Hera/Derecho/Hercules
  • Commit 'test_changes.list' from previous step

Description:

This work will be a testing ground and eventual final work to using the spack-stack 1.9.2 install in operations for the UFSWM.

Commit Message:

* UFSWM - WCOSS2 ops spack-stack 1.9.2 move.

Priority:

  • Normal

Git Tracking

UFSWM:

Sub component Pull Requests:

  • None

Documentation:

  • This PR requires a documentation update, and the WM User's Guide has been updated based on the changes in this PR.
  • This PR requires a documentation update, and a WM issue has been opened to track the need for a documentation update; a person responsible for submitting the update has been assigned to the issue (link issue).
  • No documentation update is required for this PR (please explain).

Changes

Regression Test Changes (Please commit test_changes.list):

  • No Baseline Changes.

Input data Changes:

  • None.

Library Changes/Upgrades:

  • No Updates

Testing Log:

  • RDHPCS
    • Hera
    • Orion
    • Hercules
    • GaeaC6
    • Derecho
    • Ursa
  • WCOSS2
    • Dogwood/Cactus
    • Acorn
  • CI
  • opnReqTest (complete task if unnecessary)

Comment on lines 20 to 22
setenv("CC", "icx")
setenv("CXX", "icpx")
setenv("FC", "ifort")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't the compiler names be set to Cray's wrappers, cc, CC and ftn?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think so. @AlexanderRichert-NOAA was there any change to CC, CXX and FC for the ops spack stack ?

I was testing with icx, icpx and ifort to see what it did.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc, CC and ftn worked for the S2SWA build.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The oneAPI-based ops spack-stack uses cc, CC, and ftn (which then use icx, icpx, and ifx).

@gspetro-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@BrianCurtis-NOAA Is there an update on the timeline for this PR?

@BrianCurtis-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No update yet, but still in progress.

@gspetro-NOAA gspetro-NOAA moved this to Not Ready in PRs to Process Sep 18, 2025
@gspetro-NOAA gspetro-NOAA moved this from Not Ready to Draft in PRs to Process Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

No Baseline Change No Baseline Change

Projects

Status: Draft

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test WCOSS2 spack-stack 1.9.2 intel OneAPI installation

5 participants