Move WCOSS2 to spack-stack 1.9.2 in ops (IN TESTING)

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

Commit Queue Requirements:

• Fill out all sections of this template.
• All sub component pull requests have been reviewed by their code managers.
• Run the full Intel+GNU RT suite (compared to current baselines) on either Hera/Derecho/Hercules
• Commit 'test_changes.list' from previous step

---

Description:

This work will be a testing ground and eventual final work to using the spack-stack 1.9.2 install in operations for the UFSWM.

Commit Message:

* UFSWM - WCOSS2 ops spack-stack 1.9.2 move.

Priority:

• Normal

Git Tracking

UFSWM:

• Closes Test WCOSS2 spack-stack 1.9.2 intel OneAPI installation #2830

Sub component Pull Requests:

• None

Documentation:

• This PR requires a documentation update, and the WM User's Guide has been updated based on the changes in this PR.
• This PR requires a documentation update, and a WM issue has been opened to track the need for a documentation update; a person responsible for submitting the update has been assigned to the issue (link issue).
• No documentation update is required for this PR (please explain).

---

Changes

Regression Test Changes (Please commit test_changes.list):

• No Baseline Changes.

Input data Changes:

• None.

Library Changes/Upgrades:

• No Updates

---

Testing Log:

• RDHPCS
  • Hera
  • Orion
  • Hercules
  • GaeaC6
  • Derecho
  • Ursa
• WCOSS2
  • Dogwood/Cactus
  • Acorn
• CI
• opnReqTest (complete task if unnecessary)

[DusanJovic-NOAA]

Shouldn't the compiler names be set to Cray's wrappers, cc, CC and ftn?

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

Yes, I think so. @AlexanderRichert-NOAA was there any change to CC, CXX and FC for the ops spack stack ?

I was testing with icx, icpx and ifort to see what it did.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

cc, CC and ftn worked for the S2SWA build.

[AlexanderRichert-NOAA]

The oneAPI-based ops spack-stack uses cc, CC, and ftn (which then use icx, icpx, and ifx).