feat: add codeberg provider

[joaopalmeiro]

Resolves #174

TODO

• Check how to prepare the authorization header.
• Test with a private Codeberg repository.
• Validate that the ref type (branch, commit, or tag) can be omitted from the url.

References

• https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/api-usage/#authentication
• https://codeberg.org/api/swagger (AuthorizationHeaderToken)
• https://docs.codeberg.org/advanced/access-token/

Commands

subdir

rm -rf unjs-template && pnpm giget codeberg:unjs/template/test

rm -rf unjs-template && pnpm giget codeberg:unjs/template/test#e24616c743fe6ee33c9e4d4712ba30e34cf4091d

[pi0]

Thanks for the work dear @joaopalmeiro. I might take longer for me to test and release but your work seems nice 👍🏼

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.80%. Comparing base (743c9ae) to head (4e7f085).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/providers.ts	20.00%	12 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #175      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.63%   53.80%   -0.83%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         615      630      +15     
  Branches       47       47              
==========================================
+ Hits          336      339       +3     
- Misses        278      290      +12     
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[joaopalmeiro]

Thanks for the work dear @joaopalmeiro. I might take longer for me to test and release but your work seems nice 👍🏼

Sure, take your time! Thank you for the opportunity! Let me know if anything is needed.

[joaopalmeiro]

Hi, @pi0!

Sorry to bother you, but any chance this PR will be merged in the near future? Thanks!

[joaopalmeiro]

Hi, @pi0!

Any chance this PR can be reviewed in the near future? Thanks!