Skip to content

Comment/remove unused parameter _ExecutionPolicy&& __exec in some functions #2157

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

SergeyKopienko
Copy link
Contributor

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko commented Apr 1, 2025

In this PR we made the next changes:

  • Remove _ExecutionPolicy patameter from __parallel_strict_scan_body function as not required anymore;
  • Remove _ExecutionPolicy parameter from __parallel_strict_scan function as not required anymore;
  • Comment unused template parameter _ExecutionPolicy in __pattern_transform_scan function.

This changes required due the PR #2146 has been merged into main branch.

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko marked this pull request as draft April 1, 2025 14:40
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko removed the request for review from dmitriy-sobolev April 1, 2025 14:40
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2025 14:50
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko changed the title Comment unused parameter __exec in the function __parallel_strict_scan_body Comment/remove unused parameter _ExecutionPolicy&& __exec in some functions Apr 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitriy-sobolev dmitriy-sobolev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko merged commit 28a6c39 into main Apr 2, 2025
19 checks passed
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko deleted the dev/skopienko/comment_unused_parameter_in_parallel_strict_scan_body branch April 2, 2025 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants