VCC: Prohibit the use of relative paths with +glob #4257
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These types of includes should be avoided since it would otherwise be hard to predict the right behavior when matching glob patterns in vcl_path directories. Refs varnishcache#4250 Closes varnishcache#4249
nigoroll
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2025
|
bugwash OK |
|
bugwash: ok |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a replacement for #4250, where it appeared that finding an unambiguous and easy to predict behavior when using
+globincludes with relative paths involvingvcl_pathwas not an easy task.After some discussions, the consensus was that relative paths should not be allowed when using
+globincludes.Refs #4250
Closes #4249