Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix rust-analyzer #2731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

fix rust-analyzer #2731

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

datelier
Copy link
Contributor

@datelier datelier commented Nov 5, 2024

Description

SSIA

Related Issue

Versions

  • Vald Version: v1.7.13
  • Go Version: v1.23.2
  • Rust Version: v1.81.0
  • Docker Version: v27.3.1
  • Kubernetes Version: v1.31.1
  • Helm Version: v3.16.2
  • NGT Version: v2.2.4
  • Faiss Version: v1.9.0

Checklist

Special notes for your reviewer

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated method signatures for update_timestamp, get, set, and delete to indicate unused parameters, improving code clarity.

These changes do not alter the existing functionality but enhance the readability of the code by clearly marking parameters that are not currently utilized.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to method signatures in the rust/bin/agent/src/handler/update.rs and rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs files. Specifically, the parameter names for several methods have been updated from request to _request, indicating that these parameters are intentionally unused. The functionality and return types of the methods remain unchanged, and the modifications are consistent across the affected methods.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rust/bin/agent/src/handler/update.rs Updated method signature for update_timestamp: request_request.
rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs Updated method signatures for get, set, and delete: request_request in all three methods.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix not found error for gateway handler #2726: This PR modifies error handling in the pkg/gateway/lb/handler/grpc/handler.go file, which may relate to the overall handling of requests similar to the changes made in the update_timestamp method in the main PR, although it does not directly modify the same functions or parameters.

Suggested labels

type/refactoring, priority/low, size/S

Suggested reviewers

  • kmrmt
  • vankichi

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25c2220 and e65844d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rust/bin/agent/src/handler/update.rs (1 hunks)
  • rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rust/bin/meta/src/handler/meta.rs (2)

23-23: LGTM: Proper handling of unused parameters.

The change to prefix unused parameters with underscore (_request) follows Rust's idiomatic way of indicating intentionally unused parameters. This silences the rust-analyzer warnings while maintaining code clarity.

Also applies to: 29-29, 36-36


22-39: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Unimplemented gRPC service methods.

All three methods (get, set, delete) in this gRPC service implementation are marked with todo!(), which will panic at runtime. This is a critical issue that needs to be addressed.

Let's check if this is a temporary scaffold or if it should be implemented:

Would you like help implementing these methods? I can assist with:

  1. Basic CRUD operations implementation
  2. Error handling patterns for gRPC services
  3. Unit tests for the implementation
rust/bin/agent/src/handler/update.rs (1)

52-52: LGTM! Consider applying the same pattern to other parameters.

The change from request to _request follows Rust best practices by explicitly marking unused parameters. This helps silence compiler warnings and improves code clarity.

Let's verify if other parameters in this file could benefit from the same pattern:

✅ Verification successful

All parameters consistently follow the unused variable pattern

Looking at the file content, all method parameters in the Update trait implementation are already prefixed with _ to indicate they are intentionally unused. This includes:

  • _request in update method
  • _request in stream_update method
  • _request in multi_update method
  • _request in update_timestamp method

The codebase is already consistent in its handling of unused parameters, following Rust best practices.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other potentially unused parameters in the Update trait implementation
# that could benefit from the same naming pattern.

# Test: Look for other request parameters in the same file
rg -U "fn \w+.*?Request.*?\{[\s\S]*?todo!\(\)" "rust/bin/agent/src/handler/update.rs"

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find method implementations in the update.rs file
# First, let's see the entire content of the file to understand its structure
cat rust/bin/agent/src/handler/update.rs

Length of output: 2057


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vdaas-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

vdaas-ci commented Nov 5, 2024

[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.

  • 🙆‍♀️ /approve - approve
  • 🍱 /format - format codes and add licenses
  • /gen-test - generate test codes
  • 🏷️ /label - add labels
  • 🔚 2️⃣ 🔚 /label actions/e2e-deploy - run E2E deploy & integration test

@kpango kpango merged commit a583f09 into main Nov 5, 2024
53 checks passed
@kpango kpango deleted the refactor/rust/fix-rust-analyzer branch November 5, 2024 05:14
vdaas-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
kpango pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
kpango pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
kpango added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants