Refactor and add tests for BatchError
#12
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Milly has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce a new error handling module, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Denops
participant Errors
User->>Denops: Execute batch operation
Denops->>Errors: Process operations
alt If error occurs
Errors-->>Denops: throw BatchError
Denops-->>User: Handle error with context
else If successful
Denops-->>User: Return results
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- errors.ts (1 hunks)
- errors_test.ts (1 hunks)
- mod.ts (1 hunks)
- types.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
errors.ts
[error] 14-14: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
Additional comments not posted (13)
errors.ts (3)
1-7: Well-documented module header.The documentation provides a clear overview of the module and its purpose.
9-12: Clear class documentation and declaration.The
BatchErrorclass is well-documented and the declaration is standard.
17-26: Constructor and property initialization look good.The constructor correctly initializes the
messageandresultsproperties.mod.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-25:
Well-documented module header.The documentation provides a clear overview of the module and its purpose.
26-27: Wildcard exports improve flexibility.The wildcard exports simplify the import process but ensure to verify the impact on the module usage.
Verification successful
Wildcard exports improve flexibility.
The wildcard exports simplify the import process and do not cause any issues in the module usage.
errors.tsis correctly used inerrors_test.ts.types.tsexport does not show any issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of wildcard exports on the module usage. # Test: Search for the usage of exported entities. Expect: No issues due to wildcard exports. rg --type python -A 5 $'from module_name import *'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of wildcard exports on the module usage. # Test: Search for the usage of exported entities in TypeScript files. Expect: No issues due to wildcard exports. rg --type ts -A 5 'from "./errors.ts"' rg --type ts -A 5 'from "./types.ts"'Length of output: 532
errors_test.ts (6)
1-3: Appropriate import statements.The import statements bring in necessary testing utilities and the
BatchErrorclass.
5-11: Test for.constructor()is appropriate.The test verifies the correct construction of the
BatchErrorinstance.
12-17: Test for.namegetter is appropriate.The test verifies the correct functionality of the
namegetter.
18-23: Test for.messagegetter is appropriate.The test verifies the correct functionality of the
messagegetter.
24-30: Test for.stackgetter is appropriate.The test verifies the correct functionality of the
stackgetter.
31-37: Test for.resultsgetter is appropriate.The test verifies the correct functionality of the
resultsgetter.types.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM!The module-level documentation is clear and provides useful context for the
types.tsfile.
8-8: Verify the removal ofBatchErrorclass.The
BatchErrorclass has been removed. Ensure that this change is consistent across the codebase.
Comments failed to post (1)
errors.ts
13-15: Avoid using
thisin a static context.Using
thisin a static context can be confusing. Use the class name instead.- this.prototype.name = "BatchError"; + BatchError.prototype.name = "BatchError";Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.static { BatchError.prototype.name = "BatchError"; }Tools
Biome
[error] 14-14: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
`Error.captureStackTrace()` is v8 method that provide a stack trace for custom (NOT extends from `Error`) error object. It is not necessary if the class extends from `Error`.
It is recommended that the `name` property be defined as a string on the prototype.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- errors.ts (1 hunks)
- errors_test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- errors_test.ts
Additional context used
Biome
errors.ts
[error] 14-14: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
Additional comments not posted (4)
errors.ts (4)
1-7: LGTM!The module documentation is clear and provides useful context.
9-12: LGTM!The class-level documentation is clear and provides useful context.
22-26: LGTM!The constructor is correctly implemented and initializes the
resultsproperty.
20-20: LGTM!The
resultsproperty is correctly declared as readonly.
| static { | ||
| this.prototype.name = "BatchError"; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using this in a static context.
Using this in a static context can be confusing. Use the class name instead.
- this.prototype.name = "BatchError";
+ BatchError.prototype.name = "BatchError";Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| static { | |
| this.prototype.name = "BatchError"; | |
| } | |
| static { | |
| BatchError.prototype.name = "BatchError"; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 14-14: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
BatchError, to improve management of batch processing errors.Bug Fixes
BatchError.Tests
BatchErrorclass to validate its functionality and robustness.Documentation
types.tsfile for clarity on module purpose.