-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Fix secondary requirements and conformance requirements ids #588
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for act-rules-format ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added suggestions
Co-authored-by: Kathy Eng <[email protected]>
|
||
A secondary accessibility requirement is a requirement that is correlated with the rule, but for which the rule is not designed to test. The outcome of the rule impacts the result of the accessibility requirement, but the rule is not intended to test the conformance of that requirement. This correlation often results in some of the rule's test cases not satisfying the secondary accessibility requirement. | ||
A <dfn data-lt="secondary requirement">secondary accessibility requirement</dfn> is a requirement that is correlated with the rule, but for which the rule is not designed to test. The outcome of the rule impacts the result of the accessibility requirement, but the rule is not intended to test the conformance of that requirement. This correlation often results in some of the rule's test cases not satisfying the secondary accessibility requirement. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
HI @kengdoj
Thanks for your review. I addressed your suggestions. For these definitions to work properly, I just added this data-lt
here so that we can still use [=secondary requirements=]
but keep "secondary accessibility requirements` as the visible definition term.
Let me know if you'd prefer something else.
Thanks much! Changes addressed.
@kengdoj Have you had a chance to review my latest changes to this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me!
SHA: 815ff23 Reason: push, by daniel-montalvo Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
No description provided.