Skip to content

Fix secondary requirements and conformance requirements ids #588

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

daniel-montalvo
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Deploy Preview for act-rules-format ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 161f49d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/act-rules-format/deploys/67daba2aa6489a0008a65a8b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-588--act-rules-format.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo requested a review from kengdoj March 13, 2025 14:16
@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@kengdoj kengdoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added suggestions

@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo requested a review from kengdoj March 13, 2025 16:59

A secondary accessibility requirement is a requirement that is correlated with the rule, but for which the rule is not designed to test. The outcome of the rule impacts the result of the accessibility requirement, but the rule is not intended to test the conformance of that requirement. This correlation often results in some of the rule's test cases not satisfying the secondary accessibility requirement.
A <dfn data-lt="secondary requirement">secondary accessibility requirement</dfn> is a requirement that is correlated with the rule, but for which the rule is not designed to test. The outcome of the rule impacts the result of the accessibility requirement, but the rule is not intended to test the conformance of that requirement. This correlation often results in some of the rule's test cases not satisfying the secondary accessibility requirement.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

HI @kengdoj

Thanks for your review. I addressed your suggestions. For these definitions to work properly, I just added this data-lt here so that we can still use [=secondary requirements=] but keep "secondary accessibility requirements` as the visible definition term.

Let me know if you'd prefer something else.

@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo dismissed kengdoj’s stale review March 18, 2025 16:35

Thanks much! Changes addressed.

@daniel-montalvo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kengdoj Have you had a chance to review my latest changes to this?

Copy link
Collaborator

@kengdoj kengdoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me!

@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo merged commit 815ff23 into main Apr 22, 2025
6 checks passed
@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo deleted the fix-ids branch April 22, 2025 15:15
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
SHA: 815ff23
Reason: push, by daniel-montalvo

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants