Skip to content

add cable to AuthenticatorTransport #2287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zacknewman
Copy link
Contributor

@zacknewman zacknewman commented Apr 27, 2025

Fixes #2286.


Preview | Diff

@sbweeden
Copy link
Contributor

I'm sure its understood that cable is the old name for hybrid. Given that this only lived in a draft of L3 for a limited time, and never made it into a W3C Recommendation spec, does it really make sense to include it in this list? Its already the case that the transports are of type DOMString, and the enum is non-normative and not referenced, and that RPs should deal with values that don't appear in the enum. I would also hope that Samsung will at some point refresh their returned transport to indicate hybrid instead since that's the label the WG settled on and is going forward with.

@zacknewman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fair enough. I hadn't heard of cable before.

@zacknewman zacknewman closed this Apr 27, 2025
@sbweeden
Copy link
Contributor

No problem Zack - thanks for your continued engagement.

@zacknewman zacknewman deleted the authenticatortransport branch April 27, 2025 23:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add cable to AuthenticatorTransport
2 participants