Skip to content

refactor: use for...of for better readability #168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

noritaka1166
Copy link
Contributor

use for...of for better readability

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.24%. Comparing base (9d63cbc) to head (eb0957f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #168      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.25%   93.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1823     1822       -1     
  Branches      584      584              
==========================================
- Hits         1700     1699       -1     
  Misses        114      114              
  Partials        9        9              
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 93.24% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit ff8093c into webpack:main Jun 3, 2025
28 checks passed
@noritaka1166 noritaka1166 deleted the refactor-traditional-for branch June 3, 2025 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants