Add milestone to metadata

[6543]

closes #3285

---

Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH

[woodpecker-bot]

Deployment of preview was successful: https://woodpecker-ci-woodpecker-pr-5174.surge.sh

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.11628% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 26.39%. Comparing base (bfe89c8) to head (65bc52a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
server/forge/gitlab/gitlab.go	20.00%	7 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
server/forge/gitlab/convert.go	50.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
pipeline/frontend/metadata/environment.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
server/forge/forgejo/helper.go	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️
server/forge/gitea/helper.go	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5174      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   26.37%   26.39%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         401      401              
  Lines       28536    28558      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         7525     7538      +13     
- Misses      20322    20331       +9     
  Partials      689      689              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[6543]

[6543]

done

[qwerty287]

I think it would be nice to get #4626 in first because it simplifies the structure of the pipeline model a lot.

[6543]

I think it would be nice to get #4626 in first because it simplifies the structure of the pipeline model a lot.

I personally thing that this pr should be merged and I can also resolve the conflicts in #4626 if you want ... because it does not look like the dessision of releaseing a new majour version is not started at all ... else of course it would make sense to wait ?

[xoxys]

Well... please dont rush on this one as well just because you are interested in this particular one.

[6543]

fair point ;) - as per disclaimer that one is for my dayjob and I can atm run this patch by compiling my version

[6543]

one thing to clarify would be if the milestone is ok to be exposted as env var at some point or not.
in that case it would be future prove for me to do an API call instead etc...