First attempt at image comparison using simple stats #74
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Here's the prototype of "fun-with-statistics" version of the raster comparison function. I may be able to make it more justifiable and robust with further refinement. One concern is that the tolerances must become more extreme as the raster coarseness increases and value variability decreases. Another is that the code only does a set-based statistical analysis and completely ignores the spatial aspect of the data. Maybe we could identify some maxima/minima and check spatial (or grid) proximity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Crude prototype of using simple statistics to compare rasters with different resolutions.