Skip to content

Conversation

@PasinduYeshan
Copy link

@PasinduYeshan PasinduYeshan commented Nov 12, 2025

Purpose

$subject

This pull request updates the logic for constructing PaginatedUserResponse objects in the getPaginatedUserListWithID method of AbstractUserStoreManager.java. The main improvement is ensuring that the totalResults field is set consistently based on the size of the filtered user list, which helps make pagination and response metadata more accurate.

User response construction improvements:

  • Updated the creation of PaginatedUserResponse to explicitly set the totalResults field to the size of the filtered user list when only non-identity claims are present.
  • Applied the same logic for cases where both identity and non-identity claim filters are used, ensuring totalResults reflects the actual number of users returned.
  • For scenarios with only identity claims, refactored to set totalResults using the size of the filtered user list obtained from getUserListByUsernames.

Related Issues

Comment on lines 16951 to +16953
if (identityClaimFilterCount == 0) {
paginatedUserResponse = new PaginatedUserResponse(getFilteredUsers(duplicateCondition, profileName, limit,
offset, sortBy, sortOrder, secondaryUserStoreManager));
List<User> filteredUsers = getFilteredUsers(duplicateCondition, profileName, limit,
offset, sortBy, sortOrder, secondaryUserStoreManager);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Log Improvement Suggestion No: 1

Suggested change
if (identityClaimFilterCount == 0) {
paginatedUserResponse = new PaginatedUserResponse(getFilteredUsers(duplicateCondition, profileName, limit,
offset, sortBy, sortOrder, secondaryUserStoreManager));
List<User> filteredUsers = getFilteredUsers(duplicateCondition, profileName, limit,
offset, sortBy, sortOrder, secondaryUserStoreManager);
if (identityClaimFilterCount == 0) {
log.debug("No identity claim filters found. Fetching users from user store.");
List<User> filteredUsers = getFilteredUsers(duplicateCondition, profileName, limit,

Comment on lines 16992 to +16996
if (!nonIdentityClaimExist) {
/*
* Case 2.2: Only Identity claims exist and stored in the identity store.
*/
List<User> filteredUsers = getUserListByUsernames(identityClaimFilteredUserNames);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Log Improvement Suggestion No: 2

Suggested change
if (!nonIdentityClaimExist) {
/*
* Case 2.2: Only Identity claims exist and stored in the identity store.
*/
List<User> filteredUsers = getUserListByUsernames(identityClaimFilteredUserNames);
if (!nonIdentityClaimExist) {
/*
* Case 2.2: Only Identity claims exist and stored in the identity store.
*/
log.debug("Processing users with only identity claims from identity store.");
List<User> filteredUsers = getUserListByUsernames(identityClaimFilteredUserNames);

Copy link

@wso2-engineering wso2-engineering bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Agent Log Improvement Checklist

⚠️ Warning: AI-Generated Review Comments

  • The log-related comments and suggestions in this review were generated by an AI tool to assist with identifying potential improvements. Purpose of reviewing the code for log improvements is to improve the troubleshooting capabilities of our products.
  • Please make sure to manually review and validate all suggestions before applying any changes. Not every code suggestion would make sense or add value to our purpose. Therefore, you have the freedom to decide which of the suggestions are helpful.

✅ Before merging this pull request:

  • Review all AI-generated comments for accuracy and relevance.
  • Complete and verify the table below. We need your feedback to measure the accuracy of these suggestions and the value they add. If you are rejecting a certain code suggestion, please mention the reason briefly in the suggestion for us to capture it.
Comment Accepted (Y/N) Reason
#### Log Improvement Suggestion No: 1
#### Log Improvement Suggestion No: 2

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@PasinduYeshan
Copy link
Author

@PasinduYeshan
Copy link
Author

image

sadilchamishka
sadilchamishka previously approved these changes Nov 12, 2025
@sadilchamishka sadilchamishka dismissed their stale review November 12, 2025 17:08

Need to check further

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants