XEP-0284: Various fixes, and add myself as an author #904
Conversation
Ppjet6
added
the
Needs Author
|
@stpeter, we need an ACK from authors to accept the PR! I don't know the handles for the other authors, happy if somebody can chime in. |
linkmauve
force-pushed
the
xep-0284
branch
2 times, most recently
from
bc41d2c to
e3ddf97
Compare
|
Fyi, Joonas Govenius’s email address doesn’t exist on Google’s servers anymore, and Tom Pusateri’s rejects emails sent from my server, so I couldn’t reach them. |
linkmauve
force-pushed
the
xep-0284
branch
2 times, most recently
from
67a89e0 to
a12b74d
Compare
|
It will be nice to update the XEP-0284, @linkmauve, @Ppjet6, have you progressed on it? |
|
I can take a look at this pull request. Not sure why email bounced but try again. |
|
@pusateri I believe it's the message to Joonas that bounced. Thanks for taking a look! |
|
Hi @linkmauve apparently this has been approved by at least one of the authors. Can you please rebase and squash this so I, editor, can merge this? Thank you cheers |
These had been forgotten in ae8b1eb.
This has only been tested against the XEP examples, but it should be complete.
I’d say the addition of an XML Schema is important enough to warrant putting it back on the Standards Track.
|
Hi, I just rebased, but does it really make sense to squash? I usually prefer to keep the commits as is when they are self-contained but related to the same XEP. |
I’m working on an implementation of this XEP, and I’d like to push it forward towards Draft in not so long, being an author will let me do that properly.