Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix github action run #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Fix github action run #1

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

youandvern
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @youandvern - Here's my review!

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the removal of Python 3.9 from the testing matrix is aligned with the project's compatibility and support goals.
  • Confirm that the test suite has been updated to reflect the removal of the csv_to_python_dictionary function to prevent potential issues with failing tests or decreased code coverage.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ jobs:
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
python-version: ["3.9", "3.10", "3.11"]
python-version: ["3.10", "3.11"]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question (testing): I noticed the Python version 3.9 was removed from the testing matrix. While this change might be intentional, it's important to ensure that this decision is aligned with the project's compatibility goals. If the project is still intended to support Python 3.9, we should add tests back for this version to avoid potential regressions. Could you please confirm if dropping Python 3.9 support was a deliberate choice and if so, document the rationale for future reference?

@@ -3,29 +3,6 @@
from efficalc.sections.aisc_wide_flange import WideFlange


def csv_to_python_dictionary(filepath, output_filepath):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (testing): The removal of the csv_to_python_dictionary function seems to be a significant change. However, there's no mention of corresponding updates or additions to the test suite to reflect this change. It's crucial to update the tests to ensure they don't reference or rely on the removed functionality, which could lead to failing tests or decreased code coverage. Could you please verify if the test suite has been updated accordingly and add or modify tests as necessary?

@youandvern youandvern merged commit 8a63f92 into main Mar 7, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant