merge dev to main (v2.2.2) #1511
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe updates cover a variety of changes such as dependency version increments, refactoring, and test additions. Key adjustments include updating JetBrains IDE plugin versions, refactoring the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)N/A: Changes involve various small enhancements, refactoring, and test updates, not lending themselves to a high-level sequence diagram. Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (1)
Line range hint
653-655: Remove unnecessary else clause as suggested by static analysis.- else { - // redundant code - }The static analysis tool suggests that the
elseclause is unnecessary since previous branches break early. Removing it can simplify the control flow and enhance code readability.packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
523-523: Consider replacing thedeleteoperator with setting the property toundefined.- delete entityData[field]; + entityData[field] = undefined;Using
deletecan lead to performance issues in high-load environments as it modifies the object's shape. Assigningundefinedis generally more performant and should be preferred unless you need to completely remove the property.
Line range hint
1108-1108: Replace thedeleteoperator to avoid potential performance issues.- delete entityData[field]; + entityData[field] = undefined;As previously mentioned, replacing
deletewithundefinedassignment can enhance performance by not altering the underlying structure of objects.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (13)
package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/ide/jetbrains/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/language/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/misc/redwood/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/openapi/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/swr/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/tanstack-query/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/trpc/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/runtime/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/schema/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/sdk/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/server/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/testtools/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (9)
- packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts (6 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/field-level-policy.test.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1507.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (2)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts (no review received)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts
Additional context used
Biome
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts
[error] 107-111: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 194-196: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 197-199: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 200-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 207-211: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 212-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 215-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 281-283: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts
[error] 653-655: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts
[error] 65-69: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 67-69: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 79-83: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 81-83: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 92-96: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 94-96: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 105-110: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 116-118: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 378-380: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 416-426: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 523-523: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance. (lint/performance/noDelete)
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
[error] 867-869: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 1108-1108: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance. (lint/performance/noDelete)
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
[error] 1248-1250: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 1440-1445: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function. (lint/complexity/useArrowFunction)
Function expressions that don't use this can be turned into arrow functions.
Safe fix: Use an arrow function instead.
Additional comments not posted (5)
tests/regression/tests/issue-1507.test.ts (2)
1-1: Ensure thatloadSchemais properly mocked or handled in the test environment to avoid side effects.
21-25: Ensure that the database operations and expectations in the test are aligned with the intended test outcomes.Verification successful
The search results show that the database operations in
tests/regression/tests/issue-1507.test.tsare consistent with the schema and business logic. Specifically, theprisma.profile.createoperations and theexpectstatements are present as expected.
await prisma.profile.create({ data: { age: 18 } });await prisma.profile.create({ data: { age: 20 } });await expect(db.profile.findMany()).resolves.toHaveLength(1);await expect(db.profile.count()).resolves.toBe(1);These operations align with the intended test outcomes, ensuring that the database operations and expectations in the test are correct.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the database operations in the test match the schema and business logic. # Test: Search for database operations in the test files. Expect: Operations that match the schema and business logic. rg --type typescript $'prisma.*create|expect.*resolves'Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the database operations in the test match the schema and business logic. # Test: Search for database operations in the TypeScript test files. Expect: Operations that match the schema and business logic. rg --type ts 'prisma.*create|expect.*resolves'Length of output: 70829
packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.ts (1)
704-734: Ensure accurate error messages for model-level rule comparisons.Given the complexity of the rules involving comparisons between fields of different models, it's crucial to ensure that the error messages provided are accurate and informative. This test case relates to the rule
@@allow('all', list.user.value > value)in theTodomodel, which involves a comparison between fields of different models. The error message should clearly state the limitation to guide developers correctly.Verification successful
The error message "comparison between fields of different models is not supported in model-level 'read' rules" is present in the test files and the validator source file. This confirms that the error message is being checked for accuracy in the test cases.
tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.tspackages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.tspackages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the error messages for model-level rule comparisons are accurate and helpful. # Test: Search for the test case and check the error message. rg --type python 'comparison between fields of different models is not supported in model-level "read" rules'Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the error messages for model-level rule comparisons are accurate and helpful. # Test: Search for the test case and check the error message. rg --type ts 'comparison between fields of different models is not supported in model-level "read" rules'Length of output: 814
tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/field-level-policy.test.ts (2)
30-30: Added a new fieldzwith a read denial policy based on the value ofx.This addition is consistent with the PR summary and enhances the testing of field-level policies.
44-44: Updated test cases to verify the behavior of the newly added fieldzunder various conditions.These changes are crucial for ensuring that the new field-level policy is enforced correctly across different scenarios.
Also applies to: 47-47, 51-51, 55-55, 59-59, 63-63, 67-67, 71-71, 76-76, 81-81, 86-86, 91-91, 97-97, 102-102, 104-104, 107-107, 110-110, 114-114, 116-116, 119-119, 127-127, 132-132, 134-134, 137-137, 139-139, 143-143
No description provided.