Add github.com/alvii147/gloop, Go utility library for convenient looping using Go's range-over-func feature

[alvii147]

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Maintainers Note
• I have read the Quality Standards

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
• The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
• The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
• Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

• forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc): https://github.com/alvii147/gloop
• pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/alvii147/gloop
• goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/alvii147/gloop
• coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.): No coverage service linked, but coverage is 100%, as displayed in the pipeline: https://github.com/alvii147/gloop/actions/runs/15668638683/job/44136095854

Pull Request content

• The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
• The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Iterators section in the README with a new entry: “gloop” — convenient looping using Go’s range-over-func feature, with a link for reference.
  • Enhances the list of iterator-related resources to help users discover additional looping utilities.
  • No functional or behavioral changes to the product; documentation-only update.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added a single documentation entry in README.md under Iterators: a link to “gloop” describing convenient looping via Go’s range-over-func.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation README.md	Added a new bullet under Iterators: “gloop — Convenient looping using Go’s range-over-func feature” with a GitHub link.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nibble notes in README land,
A loop named gloop hops in, so grand.
Range-over-func, a tidy trail—
My whiskers twitch at each detail.
Docs refreshed, I thump with cheer,
Small change made clear—now onward, dear! 🥕

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbit in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbit in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbit gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbit read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbit help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbit ignore or @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbit summary or @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbit or @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

• Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to awesome-go. We will review your contribution as soon as possible.

Make sure you add the links in the body of the pull request that are requested in the contribution guide:

• repo link
• pkg.go.dev
• goreportcard.com
• coverage

Your project is under review. It may take a few days to be approved.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

594-594: Nit: prefer “range over func” wording and mention Go version.

Official docs use “range over func” (no hyphens). Also, the feature requires Go 1.22+, which is helpful context for readers.

- - [gloop](https://github.com/alvii147/gloop) - Convenient looping using Go's range-over-func feature.
+ - [gloop](https://github.com/alvii147/gloop) - Convenient looping using Go 1.22+ “range over func”.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d5766c and 61d0b77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

594-596: Entry looks correct and alphabetically placed.

• Link format matches the list style.
• Position before “goterator” and “iter” is correct.