Add workflow library 'bpmn' #5794
Conversation
WalkthroughAdded a single documentation entry to README.md under "Workflow Frameworks" linking to the Go-based BPMN 2.0 engine at olive-io/bpmn; no code or API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for contributing to awesome-go. We will review your contribution as soon as possible. Make sure you add the links in the body of the pull request that are requested in the contribution guide:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
3136-3142: Keep the section alphabetically sorted; move “bpmn” to the correct position.Awesome Go requires items to be in alphabetical order within a category. “bpmn” (b…) should appear before “Cadence-client” (c…). Apply this reorder:
## Workflow Frameworks _Libraries for creating Workflows._ -- [Cadence-client](https://github.com/uber-go/cadence-client) - A framework for authoring workflows and activities running on top of the Cadence orchestration engine made by Uber. -- [Dagu](https://github.com/dagu-go/dagu) - No-code workflow executor. it executes DAGs defined in a simple YAML format. -- [go-dag](https://github.com/rhosocial/go-dag) - A framework developed in Go that manages the execution of workflows described by directed acyclic graphs. -- [go-taskflow](https://github.com/noneback/go-taskflow) - A taskflow-like General-purpose Task-parallel Programming Framework with integrated visualizer and profiler. -- [workflow](https://github.com/luno/workflow) - A tech stack agnostic Event Driven Workflow framework. - [bpmn](https://github.com/olive-io/bpmn) - Lightweight BPMN 2.0 workflow engine implemented purely in Go. +- [bpmn](https://github.com/olive-io/bpmn) - Lightweight BPMN 2.0 workflow engine implemented purely in Go. +- [Cadence-client](https://github.com/uber-go/cadence-client) - A framework for authoring workflows and activities running on top of the Cadence orchestration engine made by Uber. +- [Dagu](https://github.com/dagu-go/dagu) - No-code workflow executor. it executes DAGs defined in a simple YAML format. +- [go-dag](https://github.com/rhosocial/go-dag) - A framework developed in Go that manages the execution of workflows described by directed acyclic graphs. +- [go-taskflow](https://github.com/noneback/go-taskflow) - A taskflow-like General-purpose Task-parallel Programming Framework with integrated visualizer and profiler. +- [workflow](https://github.com/luno/workflow) - A tech stack agnostic Event Driven Workflow framework.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
3141-3141: Description looks good; ensure PR metadata meets Awesome Go quality checks.The entry text is concise and consistent. Please also update the PR checklist with working links (pkg.go.dev, goreportcard, coverage) for olive-io/bpmn to speed up review. I can help verify if you share them.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.
Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.
Please provide some links to your package to ease the review
Pull Request content
Category quality
Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.
Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.
Please delete one of the following lines:
Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎
Summary by CodeRabbit