-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Modernization of FourVectorHLT and related HLT DQM Configurations
#49610
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49610/47145 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @mmusich, @nothingface0, @rseidita can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
test parameters:
|
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
type ngt |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+hlt |
PR description:
This PR modernizes the
FourVectorHLTDQM module and updates its associated configuration to follow currentcmsswstandards and improve maintainability and configurability.FourVectorHLTimplementation (.cc, .h) to reflect modern C++/CMSSW idioms and remove legacy patterns._cff.py,_cfi.py) to align with current HLT DQM configuration conventions.HLTObjectMonitor,listOfFilters) to incorporate the modernized module interfaces.PR validation:
The module compiles cleanly within the current CMSSW release.
I generated an input file for testing via the following script:
and then analyzed it with:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, no backport needed.