Skip to content

Conversation

MTCam
Copy link
Member

@MTCam MTCam commented Nov 5, 2021

This is all mirgecom development supporting the current CEESD prediction. It is not intended to be merged to main.

To see all the branches that are "feeding production", use the "Production Feeder" PR tag:

https://github.com/illinois-ceesd/mirgecom/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3A%22Production+Feeder%22

Rebuilding the production branch is required any time any of the feeder branches (including main) changes.
The procedure for building the production branch is as follows:

  1. All feeder branches are kept up-to-date with main

  2. Create the build-production branch by merging together these branches in this order:

  3. Merge build-production into production

@MTCam MTCam changed the base branch from main to y1-production November 19, 2021 20:47
@MTCam MTCam added nomerge Not meant for merging production-critical On the critical path for CEESD production capability. labels Dec 14, 2021
This was referenced Dec 14, 2021
@MTCam MTCam added Production Feeder Feeds the production branch and removed production-critical On the critical path for CEESD production capability. labels Dec 21, 2021
@MTCam MTCam changed the base branch from y1-production to build-production December 21, 2021 15:04
@MTCam MTCam mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2022
8 tasks
@MTCam MTCam changed the base branch from build-production to +build-production May 6, 2022 13:38
@MTCam MTCam changed the base branch from +build-production to build-production May 8, 2022 15:51
@MTCam MTCam changed the base branch from build-production to +build-production May 8, 2022 15:51
@MTCam MTCam changed the base branch from +build-production to build-production May 12, 2022 21:32
PrescribedFluidBoundary.__init__(
self,
boundary_state_func=self.get_external_state,
boundary_grad_av_func=self.get_external_grad_av,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@majosm: Due to upstream changes in PhysicalAV #735 , AV funcs no longer in the fluid boundary constructs. We'll remove the old AV as soon as we get it weeded out of our stuff.

MTCam and others added 30 commits June 30, 2025 22:13
need to fix loop fusion to distinguish base DOF axis from quad DOF axis for this case
to work reliably
* install pocl 6 by default but warn about potential performance degradation issue

* fix pydocstyle

* make check more specific

* fix mypy

* make check less specific

* nudge pyro eos test tolerance

* temporarily xfail the failing overintegration test

need to fix loop fusion to distinguish base DOF axis from quad DOF axis for this case
to work reliably

* make doublemach and doublemach_physical_av generate the same mesh

* add issue link to xfail

* use non-deprecated argument in generate_gmsh

* disable SVM on pocl6 where possible, otherwise warn
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

nomerge Not meant for merging Production Feeder Feeds the production branch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants