Links to Active Learning Papers

[jduerholt]

Motivation

I was looking up papers referenced in the active learning acqfs and thought it could be useful to have the links directly in, then the next does not need to search for them again.

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on pull requests?

Yes.

Test Plan

Just docs, I hope they build and look correct as I am not 100% sure how they are displayed in the API references if put in as I did ... let's see ;)

[Balandat]

It's pretty easy to check locally how things will render, see the instructions here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (cb9634a) to head (297e446).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main     #3164   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   99.99%   100.00%           
========================================
  Files         219       219           
  Lines       21254     21221   -33     
========================================
- Hits        21252     21221   -31     
+ Misses          2         0    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jduerholt]

It's pretty easy to check locally how things will render, see the instructions here.

Thanks for the hint, just one comment here: If you build the docs locally with the command from your link, it opens up a locally served website, but in this locally served website, it is still pointed to the readthedocs global website for the API reference. I only had a quick look but could not figure out where this is hardcoded. So I build the api references just directly via sphinx (make html). It is rendering now correctly, so from my side this is good to go.

[Balandat]

Thanks - yes good point I guess I hadn't really tested this with the new website linking to readthedocs (we got rid of our own custom setup b/c it was too brittle).

@CristianLara any best practices for how to do this kind of doc testing with readthedocs? Should we update the CONTRIBUTING.md file accordingly?

[meta-codesync]

@Balandat has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D92643090.