-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 400
feat(vite-plugin-meta-comments): optimize the processing of directly executing functions. If the function is directly called, only a synchronous ctx context is generated #1489
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update removes a function and its traversal hook that previously checked for direct calls to locally declared functions, eliminating related console warnings. It introduces a utility to gather valid scope bindings, enhances logic for function wrapping based on direct invocation detection, and reorders declarations and invocations in test files to reflect these changes. Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/src/transform.js
(0 hunks)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/src/utils.js
(2 hunks)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/expected/entry.js.output.js
(4 hunks)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/entry.js
(1 hunks)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/output.js
(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/src/transform.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/entry.js (2)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/expected/entry.js.output.js (2)
sendMessage
(89-106)ccc
(108-108)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/output.js (2)
sendMessage
(96-116)ccc
(118-118)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/expected/entry.js.output.js (2)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/entry.js (2)
sendMessage
(40-42)ccc
(46-46)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/output.js (2)
sendMessage
(96-116)ccc
(118-118)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/output.js (2)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/expected/entry.js.output.js (2)
sendMessage
(89-106)ccc
(108-108)packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/entry.js (2)
sendMessage
(40-42)ccc
(46-46)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: push-check
- GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/entry.js (1)
44-46
: LGTM! Test restructuring aligns with PR objectives.The reordering of
sendMessage()
call beforeccc
declaration effectively tests the new direct function call detection logic. This pattern should trigger the synchronous context generation optimization introduced in this PR.packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/legacy/code/output.js (2)
117-118
: LGTM! Expected output correctly reflects the new transformation logic.The reordered function call and variable declaration in the transformed output aligns with the input test case and demonstrates the plugin's proper handling of direct function invocations.
38-38
: Context objects properly updated.The
ccc
variable is correctly included in all context objects, maintaining consistency across all wrapped function calls.Also applies to: 61-61, 90-90
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/test/expected/entry.js.output.js (2)
107-108
: LGTM! Expected output maintains consistency.The function call and variable declaration order matches the pattern established in other test files, ensuring consistent testing of the direct call detection feature.
38-38
: Context variables properly ordered.The
ccc
variable is correctly positioned in all context objects, maintaining consistency with the variable declaration order changes.Also applies to: 58-58, 84-84
packages/build/vite-plugin-meta-comments/src/utils.js (1)
162-177
: Helper function correctly identifies variable declarator context.The
getCurrentScopeBodyAndVarId
function properly detects when a function is declared as a variable initializer (e.g.,const foo = () => {}
). The path traversal logic correctly identifies the parent body array where direct calls would occur.
English | 简体中文
feat(vite-plugin-meta-comments): 优化直接执行函数的处理,若函数为直接调用,则仅生成同步的上下文
单元测试用例:

页面启动:

PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Bug Fixes
Tests